# Case Study Template

## GREEN FINANCE Curriculum

---

## Case Study Information

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| **Case ID** | CS-M[#]-[##] |
| **Title** | [Descriptive title] |
| **Module** | [Module number and title] |
| **Topic** | [Related topic] |
| **Difficulty** | [Introductory / Intermediate / Advanced] |
| **Duration** | [X minutes for discussion] |
| **Author** | [Name, Institution] |
| **Version** | 1.0 |
| **Last Updated** | [Date] |

---

## Learning Objectives

This case study helps learners:
1. [Specific skill/knowledge to develop]
2. [Specific skill/knowledge to develop]
3. [Specific skill/knowledge to develop]

**Related Learning Outcomes:**
- LO[X]: [Abbreviated outcome]
- LO[X]: [Abbreviated outcome]

---

## Case Synopsis

[2-3 paragraph summary of the case - enough for instructor to quickly understand the scenario]

---

## Background

### Organization/Context

**Organization:** [Name]
**Industry:** [Sector]
**Location:** [Country/Region]
**Size:** [Employees, revenue, etc.]
**Time Period:** [When case takes place]

### Industry Context

[1-2 paragraphs on relevant industry trends, market conditions, regulatory environment]

### Key Players

| Name/Role | Description | Relevance |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|
| [Person/Entity 1] | | |
| [Person/Entity 2] | | |
| [Person/Entity 3] | | |

---

## The Situation

### Initial Conditions

[Describe the starting point - what was the status quo before the challenge arose?]

### The Challenge

[Describe the specific problem, decision, or opportunity that forms the core of the case]

### Constraints

- Constraint 1: [Time, budget, regulatory, etc.]
- Constraint 2:
- Constraint 3:

### Stakeholder Perspectives

| Stakeholder | Interest | Position |
|-------------|----------|----------|
| [Stakeholder 1] | | |
| [Stakeholder 2] | | |
| [Stakeholder 3] | | |

---

## Data and Evidence

### Quantitative Data

| Metric | Value | Source | Year |
|--------|-------|--------|------|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |

### Key Documents/Exhibits

**Exhibit 1:** [Description]
[Include or reference relevant documents, charts, financial statements, etc.]

**Exhibit 2:** [Description]

**Exhibit 3:** [Description]

---

## Discussion Questions

### Basic Understanding (5-10 min)
1. [Question to check comprehension of case facts]
2. [Question to identify key issues]

### Analysis (15-20 min)
3. [Question requiring application of concepts]
4. [Question requiring evaluation of options]
5. [Question requiring synthesis of information]

### Decision/Recommendation (10-15 min)
6. [Question asking for specific recommendation]
7. [Question about implementation considerations]

### Reflection (5 min)
8. [Question connecting to broader themes/principles]
9. [Question about lessons learned/transferability]

---

## Teaching Notes

### Suggested Approach

**Before Class:**
- [Pre-reading or preparation required]
- [Concepts students should understand]

**In Class:**
1. [Opening - X min]
2. [Small group discussion - X min]
3. [Full class discussion - X min]
4. [Wrap-up and key takeaways - X min]

### Key Teaching Points

1. **Point 1:** [Concept to emphasize]
   - Connection to theory:
   - Common student misconception:

2. **Point 2:** [Concept to emphasize]
   - Connection to theory:
   - Common student misconception:

3. **Point 3:** [Concept to emphasize]
   - Connection to theory:
   - Common student misconception:

### Discussion Guide

**Question 1:** [Question]
- Expected responses:
- Probing questions:
- Key insight to draw out:

**Question 2:** [Question]
- Expected responses:
- Probing questions:
- Key insight to draw out:

[Continue for all questions]

### Board Plan

[Suggested structure for capturing discussion on whiteboard/slides]

```
+------------------+------------------+
|    Issue 1       |    Issue 2       |
+------------------+------------------+
| - Point          | - Point          |
| - Point          | - Point          |
+------------------+------------------+
|           Recommendations           |
+------------------------------------+
```

---

## What Actually Happened (Optional)

[If based on real events, describe the actual outcome - can be revealed after discussion]

### Outcome
[Description of what the organization actually did and results]

### Lessons Learned
- Lesson 1:
- Lesson 2:
- Lesson 3:

---

## ASEAN Localization Notes

### Relevance to Vietnam
- Similar situations:
- Local examples:
- Regulatory differences:

### Relevance to Thailand
- Similar situations:
- Local examples:
- Regulatory differences:

### Relevance to Philippines
- Similar situations:
- Local examples:
- Regulatory differences:

---

## Assessment Integration

### Formative Assessment Options
- [ ] In-class discussion participation
- [ ] Written case analysis (individual)
- [ ] Group presentation
- [ ] Peer evaluation

### Summative Assessment Options
- [ ] Case analysis report
- [ ] Exam question based on case
- [ ] Comparison with other cases

### Rubric Elements
| Criterion | Weight |
|-----------|--------|
| Understanding of facts | [%] |
| Application of concepts | [%] |
| Quality of analysis | [%] |
| Feasibility of recommendations | [%] |
| Communication/presentation | [%] |

---

## References and Sources

### Primary Sources
1. [Source used to develop case]
2.
3.

### Background Reading
1. [Recommended reading for students]
2.
3.

### Related Cases
1. [Similar case for comparison]
2.
3.

---

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Facts are accurate and verifiable
- [ ] All data sources cited
- [ ] Discussion questions test learning outcomes
- [ ] Teaching notes are comprehensive
- [ ] Difficulty level appropriate for audience
- [ ] ASEAN context addressed
- [ ] Accessibility requirements met
- [ ] Peer review completed

---

## Version History

| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---------|------|--------|---------|
| 1.0 | | | Initial draft |
| | | | |

---

## Permissions and Acknowledgments

[Note any permissions required or acknowledgments for data/sources used]